There is no simple answer to curb the escalating gun violence in
America and the pain, suffering, anger, mental and emotional anguish that
families, friends and loved ones have to endure when faced with attending the
funeral of those whom they will never see again in this life. One of the
cornerstones of your organization is the “right” to keep and bear arms as
guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. While it is not my
suggestion that the federal government should confiscate every citizen’s guns
because such an action would be impractical but the issue of gun ownership is
worth looking at again, from a perspective that, at least to my knowledge, has
not been introduced into this public debate. There is an old saying in some
Christian circles, “Text without Context becomes Pretext.” This relates to
interpreting Biblical passages without taking into account the circumstances in
which the narratives are written, and the absence of such a technique can lead
someone to misapply scriptural standards to a given social situation.
That being said, the Constitution is more than just the articles and
amendments but rather a whole document, including the Preamble, and most
importantly, the Declaration of Independence. In fact, it is the latter that
provides, at least to my thinking, the moral and legal justification for the
colonists, though still subjects to the King of England and British Parliament,
which granted charters or legal agreements to establish colonies in the New
World, due to abuses from their sovereign, to declare themselves free and
independent states and no longer subject to the monarchy. There are at least 17
reasons or categories that those in rebellion gave for their decision, which
were reintroduced or formed the basis for inclusion as the Second Amendment,
Federalist papers notwithstanding, are as follows:
The state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the
dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions from within (Second Amendment; Article 1, Section 8b).
He has kept among us in
times of peace standing armies (Third
Amendment; Second Amendment), without the consent of our legislatures.
For quartering large bodies
of armed troops among us; for protecting them, by a mock trial, from
punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of
these states (Second Amendment; Third
Amendment).
He has abdicated government
here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us (Second Amendment).
He is at this time, transporting
large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death (Second Amendment), desolation, and
tyranny already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy; scarcely
parallel in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy of the head of a
civilized nation.
He has excited domestic
insurrections among us (Article 1,
Section 8b), and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our
frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rules for
warfare, is an undistinguished destruction, of all ages, sexes, and conditions
(Second Amendment).
So, in a nutshell this is why the right to bear arms was written into
the Constitution because it was adopted and codified during a period based on
the aftermath of the Revolutionary War of 1776. All the 13 individual colonies
had at this time in the way of domestic security were civilian Militias for
protection, and so it would seem prudent as well as practical, to enact into
law what was customary practice to keep gunpowder and musket within reach just
in case one had to respond to some unexpected internal or external threat.
Personally, I don’t know whether fewer guns or more guns are the answer, but at
least for the sake of constitutional clarity, before you start yelling about
gun rights, read the Declaration of Independence first and stop using the
Second Amendment as though it is sacred, like one of the Ten Commandments.
Robert Randle
776 Commerce St. #B-11
Tacoma, WA 98402
April 12, 2013
robertrandle51@yahoo.com